Show Summary Details
Page of

(p. 72) How to Assess the Impacts of Interventions 

(p. 72) How to Assess the Impacts of Interventions
Chapter:
(p. 72) How to Assess the Impacts of Interventions
Author(s):

Brian A. Sharpless

DOI:
10.1093/med-psych/9780190676278.003.0007
Page of

date: 19 March 2019

Whenever individual psychodynamic techniques are applied, it is important to quickly assess their proximal clinical impacts. Therefore, this chapter focuses on helping clinicians identify the many, and sometimes subtle, signs that an intervention was either corroborated or disconfirmed. Common examples of both sets of patient signs are included. Some characteristic indicators of corroboration include the generation of new and emotionally rich clinical material. Signs of disconfirmation may include the patient verbally rejecting the intervention, stalled free association, or an alliance rupture. However, clinical context is important to consider, as indicators may vary greatly across patients and according to their relative location on the supportive–expressive continuum. Finally, the concept of a corrective emotional experience is discussed as another possible clinical impact. Clinical criteria for an in-session corrective emotional experience are proposed.

Access to the complete content on Oxford Clinical Psychology requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.