Show Summary Details
Page of

(p. 133) Letter to Enid Balint 

(p. 133) Letter to Enid Balint
Chapter:
(p. 133) Letter to Enid Balint
Author(s):

Donald W. Winnicott

DOI:
10.1093/med:psych/9780190271374.003.0029
Page of

date: 23 April 2018

A letter from Winnicott to Enid Balint supporting her paper, presented to the BPAS, and asking her to omit reference to oral dependence in his work. He maintains a distinction between regression to dependence, and instinctual regression. Winnicott laments the tendency in the BPAS to interpret the material of the papers of colleagues, instead of properly discussing it.

Access to the complete content on Oxford Clinical Psychology requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.