View:
- no detail
- some detail
- full detail

Pseudologia Fantastica—Pathological Lying
Petra Garlipp
in Unusual and Rare Psychological Disorders: A Handbook for Clinical Practice and Research
Lying is a part of normal psychological behavior; it can be triggered by feelings of shame or guilt, and is often used to avoid conflict. However, pseudologia fantastica is characterized by ...
More

Interpretation
Jane Goodman-Delahunty and William E. Foote
in Evaluation for Workplace Discrimination and Harassment
Chapter 6 discusses interpretation of data using the five-stage model introduced in chapter five. This chapter also introduces the fourth and fifth phases of the assessment, which focus on ...
More

Introduction
Steve Rubenzer
in Assessing Negative Response Bias in Competency to Stand Trial Evaluations
This chapter introduces the reader to negative response bias—malingering, feigning, and lack of cooperation, and their prevalence in competency to stand trial evaluations. The chapter cites ...
More

Special Problems and Populations in Feigned Incompetence
Steve Rubenzer
in Assessing Negative Response Bias in Competency to Stand Trial Evaluations
This chapter addresses assessment of feigning or exaggeration in cases involving claimed amnesia for the crime, in intellectually disabled defendants, and in adolescent examinees. Claimed ...
More

Assessment of Malingering on Psychological Measures
Richard Rogers and Nathan D. Gillard
in Psychologists' Desk Reference (3 ed.)
Chapter 6 discusses the assessment of malingering on psychological measures, common misconceptions of malingering, assessment of feigned mental disorders (including MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF and ...
More

Malingering/Cooperation/Effort
Richard I. Frederick
in Ziskin's Coping with Psychiatric and Psychological Testimony (6 ed.)
This chapter discusses malingering, cooperation, and effort, including impediments to identifying malingering, attempts to contend with malingering, proper approaches to evaluating ...
More

Assessing Negative Response Bias in Competency to Stand Trial Evaluations
Steven J. Rubenzer
Assessing Negative Response Bias in Competency to Stand Trial Evaluations provides a comprehensive guide to assessing malingering, feigning, poor effort, and lack of ...
More

The Evaluation: Data Gathering and Interview Strategy
Steve Rubenzer
in Assessing Negative Response Bias in Competency to Stand Trial Evaluations
This chapter considers evaluation strategies beginning from receipt of the referral to the conclusion of the interview. It emphasizes the value of obtaining information before the ...
More

CST Instruments and General Clinical Measures
Steve Rubenzer
in Assessing Negative Response Bias in Competency to Stand Trial Evaluations
This chapter discusses the most commonly used instruments for assessing competency to stand trial, their vulnerability to feigning, and attempts and approaches to remedying this deficiency. ...
More

Instruments for Assessing Feigned or Exaggerated Psychopathology
Steve Rubenzer
in Assessing Negative Response Bias in Competency to Stand Trial Evaluations
This chapter reviews the most prominent instruments for assessing malingered mental illness and its symptoms. The Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) has been regarded as the ...
More

Measures of Feigned or Exaggerated Incompetence
Steve Rubenzer
in Assessing Negative Response Bias in Competency to Stand Trial Evaluations
This chapter describes and reviews the published instruments available to assess feigned incompetence to stand trial. The Inventory of Legal Knowledge has already gained considerable ...
More

Empirical Foundations and Limits
Andrew W. Kane and Joel A. Dvoskin
in Evaluation for Personal Injury Claims
Chapter 3 discusses the nature of psychological evidence, and the difficulty in coming to sound conclusions when psychological harms are largely based on the plaintiff's subjective ...
More
View:
- no detail
- some detail
- full detail