Show Summary Details
Page of

(p. 19) The Role of the Courts in Supporting Therapeutic Interventions 

(p. 19) The Role of the Courts in Supporting Therapeutic Interventions
Chapter:
(p. 19) The Role of the Courts in Supporting Therapeutic Interventions
Author(s):

Nicholas Bala

, and Marjorie A. Slabach

DOI:
10.1093/med-psych/9780190693237.003.0002
Page of

date: 21 October 2019

This chapter discusses the role of the family courts and lawyers in supporting, and in some situations limiting, the types of interventions that can be provided to children and their parents in high conflict coparenting cases. It is essential to have collaboration and communication between the judges, lawyers, and mental health professionals if there are to be healthy child outcomes. Increasingly, family judges recognize they have a responsibility not only to resolve disputes between parents, but also to protect the interests of their children, and to encourage a settlement if this is reasonably possible, as well as to hold parents accountable, if they fail to meaningfully engage in court-ordered interventions or parenting arrangements. There are a variety of ways that judges involve mental health professionals to help address family problems, including directing parents to mediation, parenting education, or family or individual therapy, or by appointing a mental health professional undertake an evaluation of a family and report to the court and the parties.

Access to the complete content on Oxford Clinical Psychology requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.