Show Summary Details
Page of

(p. 379) Self-Disclosure and Immediacy 

(p. 379) Self-Disclosure and Immediacy
(p. 379) Self-Disclosure and Immediacy

Clara E. Hill

, Sarah Knox

, and Kristen G. Pinto-Coelho

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY ONLINE ( © Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Clinical Psychology Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 05 May 2021

We conducted a qualitative meta-analysis of 21 studies that examined the clinical consequences of therapist self-disclosure (TSD) and immediacy (Im) in psychotherapy. The most frequent consequences were enhanced therapy relationship, improved client functioning, gain in insight, and overall helpfulness, suggesting that the consequences are mostly positive and therapeutic. TSD was associated more often with improved mental health functioning, more overall helpfulness, and more enhanced therapy relationships, whereas Im was associated more often with clients opening up and being more immediate. The chapter concludes with limitations of the research, diversity considerations, and research-informed recommendations for judiciously using TSD and Im in practice.

Access to the complete content on Oxford Clinical Psychology requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.