Show Summary Details
Page of

(p. 91) Consensus and Collaboration in the Working Alliance 

(p. 91) Consensus and Collaboration in the Working Alliance
Chapter:
(p. 91) Consensus and Collaboration in the Working Alliance
Author(s):

Jairo N. Fuertes

, Michael T. Moore

, and Chloe C. Pagano-Stalzer

DOI:
10.1093/med-psych/9780190868529.003.0005
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY ONLINE (www.oxfordclinicalpsych.com). © Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Clinical Psychology Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 26 February 2020

In this chapter, the authors address the concepts of consensus and collaboration, which are two related constructs that underlie the working alliance. The authors discuss how to establish consensus and collaboration with patients, as well as how consensus and collaboration evolve from the beginning of treatment to termination. Additionally, they provide clinical examples of how to achieve consensus and collaboration within the working alliance and discuss three interrelated markers of client behavior that signal that there is consensus and collaboration in the therapist–client dyad—collaborative motivation, framework consensus, and collaborative action. The goal of this chapter is to provide therapists with the tools to foster a “confident collaborative relationship.”

Access to the complete content on Oxford Clinical Psychology requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.