Disclaimer

Oxford University Press makes no representation, express or implied, that the drug dosages in this book are correct. Readers must therefore always check the product information and clinical procedures with the most up to date published product information and data sheets provided by the manufacturers and the most recent codes of conduct and safety regulations. The authors and the publishers do not accept responsibility or legal liability for any errors in the text or for the misuse or misapplication of material in this work. Except where otherwise stated, drug dosages and recommendations are for the non-pregnant adult who is not breastfeeding.

Show Summary Details
Page of

(p. 263) Learning at work: Toward a learning stance in teams 

(p. 263) Learning at work: Toward a learning stance in teams
Chapter:
(p. 263) Learning at work: Toward a learning stance in teams
Author(s):

Dickon Bevington

, Peter Fuggle

, Liz Cracknell

, and Peter Fonagy

DOI:
10.1093/med-psych/9780198718673.003.0007
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY ONLINE (www.oxfordclinicalpsych.com). © Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Clinical Psychology Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 15 January 2021

Team learning, the focus of the fourth quadrant of the AMBIT wheel, is justified by strong evidence about the weak translation of evidence-based trainings into practice fidelity, and weak clinical outcomes from even the most powerfully evidenced practices. The need for strong leadership (and what this entails) to support development of a learning organization is described. Research findings on quality improvements and outcomes in health and social care settings lead to a framework of AMBIT competencies. The notion of local team “manualization” is introduced; this is the systematic effort of a team over time to reflect upon and record (mentalize) how the team works, and why. Discussion of treatment manuals and (as the AMBIT stance presents it) the tension between “Respect for evidence” and “Respect for local practice and expertise” lead to notions of co-construction. Technical aspects of AMBIT’s wiki manual are described, along with how these aspects support a community of practice and mirror “open-source” IT developments.

Access to the complete content on Oxford Clinical Psychology requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.