Show Summary Details
Page of

(p. 123) Letter to Hannah Ries 

(p. 123) Letter to Hannah Ries
Chapter:
(p. 123) Letter to Hannah Ries
Author(s):

Donald W. Winnicott

DOI:
10.1093/med:psych/9780190271367.003.0028
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY ONLINE (www.oxfordclinicalpsych.com). © Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Clinical Psychology Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 21 January 2021

In this letter, Winnicott says that Klein herself does not omit the work of Freud, although some of her group give that impression, which he feels is unfortunate. He states his belief that it is the job of medically qualified analysts to tackle the analyses of psychotics, but that nonmedical analysts cannot avoid psychotic phases in character analyses where there is no obvious psychotic label. He says that he finds himself labeled as only concerned with regression.

Access to the complete content on Oxford Clinical Psychology requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.