Show Summary Details
Page of

(p. 56) War Versus Justice in Response to Terrorist Attacks: Competing Frames and Their Implications 

(p. 56) War Versus Justice in Response to Terrorist Attacks: Competing Frames and Their Implications
Chapter:
(p. 56) War Versus Justice in Response to Terrorist Attacks: Competing Frames and Their Implications
Author(s):

Clark McCauley

DOI:
10.1093/med:psych/9780195172492.003.0004
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY ONLINE (www.oxfordclinicalpsych.com). © Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Clinical Psychology Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 28 February 2021

Chapter 4 explores war versus justice as a response to terrorist attacks. It considers framing and human judgment, a framing analysis of the difference between 1993 and 2001, a background to the justice and war perspectives, along with those of criminals versus combatants, small versus large enemies, competing priorities versus survival, police work versus combat, and judicial error versus collateral damage.

Access to the complete content on Oxford Clinical Psychology requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.