Show Summary Details
Page of

(p. 287) Conceptualizing Forensic Animal Maltreatment Evaluations 

(p. 287) Conceptualizing Forensic Animal Maltreatment Evaluations
Chapter:
(p. 287) Conceptualizing Forensic Animal Maltreatment Evaluations
Author(s):

Lacey Levitt

and Thomas Grisso

DOI:
10.1093/med:psych/9780199360901.003.0010
Page of

date: 21 October 2019

The statutes of many states permit or mandate that judges order mental health evaluations of persons convicted of harming animals. This chapter identifies and explores forensic animal maltreatment evaluations (FAMEs) for the courts as a potential field of forensic assessment. It begins by examining the legal questions that FAMEs are expected to address. In the absence of clear statutory guidance, the authors suggest possible ways to frame the relevant questions for various types of cases. The chapter explores concepts that could be useful in translating the information the court seeks into things that are observable and assessable. In that analysis, the chapter draws elements of other types of forensic assessment such as child custody and child neglect, exploring their potential to assist in the development of FAMEs. Finally, the development of the types of assessment methods needed to build a portfolio of specialized tools are explored.

Access to the complete content on Oxford Clinical Psychology requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.