Show Summary Details
Page of

(p. 299) Child Custody 

(p. 299) Child Custody
(p. 299) Child Custody

Kirk Heilbrun

, David DeMatteo

, Stephanie Brooks Holliday

, and Casey LaDuke

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY ONLINE ( © Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Clinical Psychology Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 16 January 2021

The two reports in this chapter are assessments of child custody. Requests for child custody evaluations typically come from the court, or from attorneys representing one of the divorcing parties. Even under the latter circumstances, however, the evaluator may be court-appointed in some jurisdictions. The first case addresses the importance of determiningthe particular role to be played if the referralis accepted and focuses on the implicationsof assuming simultaneous professional roles,such as therapist and evaluator, in the context ofFMHA. The principle associatedwith the second case addresses the importance ofusing multiple sources of information to test rivalhypotheses and improve the accuracy of the evaluation.

Access to the complete content on Oxford Clinical Psychology requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.